how much solar is needed to power everyone's homes to make the world "sustainable"

Mr. Math doesn't think solar and wind is "the answer" to anything other than creating an automated industry of milking cash cows

The presentation from Planet of the Humans featured a statement about a football field size solar farm only powering 10 homes so we called him in to first regurgitate his pronoun then cough up some logic and reason using mathematics to help us see of solar (and wind) is a good FIT for the planet

300 x 160 feet

football field

= 48,000 square feet = 1.1 acre

powers 10 homes peak hours is the claim not sure just how many appliances during that day

Navajo County 9,950 square miles

Los Angeles 469 square miles

in one square mile there is 640 acres

Los Angeles contains 409,600 acres then

so if 10 homes are powered by a football field all coverd in solar

then covering all of Los Angeles in solar powers 4,096,000 homes

since say average of 4 live in each home then that powers the homes of 1 million people there

this is a ratio of 1/4 where not all the space needs to be covered then if all the people are served only solar to power it

quick glance would present each home does not have 1/4 of a football field of space even mansions don't have that much space

a mansion would use about the amount of 10 homes so it would need a full acre covered in solar, they wouldn't do that unless by force as they want their full acre worth 10 million dollars to be green and lush

even if they bought the 1 acre plot next to them they would not want to look at solar panels who does? they are ugly

so there is no way this would work as even if every building was fully covered in these panels many of these homes would not even have 1/10 of a football field of solar installed to power their one home

this would be 1/10 th of one acre or a 5,000 square feet

a small house on a tiny 5,000 square foot lot covered completely insolar panels could "sustain itself" in electricity, when the sun is out at peak hours, adding batteries would be futile other than maybe delaying use more for after dark but still the entire lot would need to be covered

this could never happen for many planning reasons and clash with physics and would make living on the lot hell if it even was possible to get past regulative hurdles

the solar panels mandated on top of homes is a JOKE and an illusion of more of these movie set energy projects that entertain and pacify

going back to our 5,000 foot print of solar panels necessary what is on the top of a home is at most 1/20th that amount thus adding them add 1/20th of what a home needs to "sustain itself" does nothing to provide energy needed to that city as they would then have to be placed somewhere else

thus the push to add them to the grid elsewhere such as in all the open spaces like the once pristine desert like at Ivanpau off Interstate 15 on the way to Las Vegas where you decide what money you want to gamble

politicians take your money and gamble with your money in taxes and electric bills to build these solar panels which we just have shown cannot be placed fully in Los Angeles to stustain it, they certainly will not destroy the big open spaces of Griffith Park to add solar panels, so the crunch continues, there simply is at best 1/50th of the space there that these could be installed there so 1/50th the claim of powering the entire city thus we are down to if my math continues to be correct though I might be off here, an amount of 80,000 people in a city of 4 million being powered by solar panels, that is 2% of the people served by "sustainable" solar power

apply this to Navajo County at .047 ratio that's 3,770 people there powered only with solar panels if the entire region as only practically can be installed with solar panels as shown with Los Angeles figures

thus we see in this county vast tracks of land undeveloped starting the process of filling in for what Los Angeles cannot even begin to set up so they run just on "sustainable" "renewable" energy

since they still would need to install 49 x more to fill in we would take the amount they installed and multiply by 49 and that will be Navajo County in 40 years filled maybe half of all open space to "sustainably" power Los Angeles

it's already been stated the West Camp and Chevelon Butte wind farms will simply sell their energy to the grid where it then will usually go to of all places Los Angeles and we just determined why

and guess what we didn't factor in, we counted home use, we did not count industry and business!

what if that's why California keeps driving out business and industry? the more they leave the more they can keep using their own math to make it look like they keep reaching their fake clean energy targets!

 now who here has not encountered someone cheating at some game they were playing with you?

case closed. solar and wind are not up to the task. they are wastes of our green $$$ energy and are ugly pieces of inefficient made in China crap.